:: View topic - full manufacturing process: from the wood to the snow

These are my 4th and 5th pair. One was finished about a month ago, the other one still need some work: I have to thin the core, as they get a little bit too stiff.

This is used to cut the base:

Then I glue the orizontally laminated core (3ply birch plywood)

Then I machine the core: it is 4mm think at the tip and tail and 12mm thick in the centre.

I bend the wood with hot water

I usually do not put the edges in the tip and tail

but here I did: the edges were annealed to remove the temper

Now lamination and pressing under vacuum (glass: 300g/m2 biaxial and 425g/m2 UD between the base and the core and 425g/m2 UD as top layer )

They I cut out the skis form the board with a "kataba meiko"

Here they are

I called them the "()", that is double parentesis. They are somehow like the Kananas: inner radius is about 25m, on the outer edge they have a very small reverse sidecut; they are about 90mm wide. Actually I wanted to make something different, but I made a mistake in cutting the base, so I recycled the base for these ones.

I tested them in Les Paccots (CH). This is a tiny resorts in the "pre-alpes fribourgeoises".

http://www.les-paccots.ch/haut_int.php3?id_rubrique=1&id_point_interet=2487375&id_menu=135&id_menu_pere=2&langue2=e&p=0|0|2|3|5|

I love this kind of places. I had also my TUA OneTen, that I used in the morning. When I do testing I always have a backup pair, just in case Then in the afternoon I picked up the "()".

They are nice when I ski them parallel in piste; in tele turns, I found difficult to keep the inner ski on the edge. I have Crispi CXA, and I have already noticed that it requires some effort to put a 90mm ski on the edges; I can do that, but it is not fun. Probably 80mm is the limit for these boots.

In off-piset (powder) they were nice of course. But 100mm or even 120mm at the centre are even better.

I think that if I must choose only two pair of skis, I would pick up a 110-75-100 for piste and backcountry (in variable conditions) and a 100mm or even 120mm wide ski (standard or reverse sidecut) for the pow-days. 90mm wide skis are not more forgiving in piste than a 110mm (at least for me) and they are not so impressive in the powder as the really large ones.

Pretty cool. I really like your adjustable sidecut template thingy. Is it wood or metal? I can't tell from the pic. [are those two home made long boards on the floor in that pic?] And the "tiger stripe" pattern you get from shaping the plywood is cool too.

Those saws are awesome. I've only heard them called "japanese razor saws" or a "japanese pull saw" since they cut on the pull stroke. I got one that has a coarse side and a fine side for building a boat [which is sitting half finished in my livingroom] and I'm amazed how easy it is to make quick precise cuts. Best hand saw I've ever used by far. Amazon has a lot if some body wants one and can't find it locally.

Are you not using inserts? I'd guess that it might be hard to line up the bases so they were in the right spot. Do you work in a lab?

The adjustable templetate is made with an L shape aluminium bar, 2.2m long (measurements are in picture) and a wood stick.

Yes, I made three longboard up to now. I did them also to get trained for the skis.

Your saw is a ryoba: the coarse side is to cut along the grain, the fine one to cut across. I got them from www.answerk.ch but also www.fine-tools.com has many of them.

Yes, I did the work in the lab at the University (in the evening or during the weekend)

davide, awesome setup. i especially like that saw! i'm thinking about making a vacuum setup as well. what are the specs on your vacuum pump? what kind of pressure are you exerting on the skis? are there any problems with the materials moving around while vacuumming out the air?

The primary pumps can go down to 10E-2/10E-3 bar.

I have a manometer on the pipes connecting the pump with the bag (you can see it in the photos), and it goes down to zero. I read on grafsnwboard that someone put a second manometer directy connected with the bag, at the tip or tail, just to be sure the pressure was low enough also at the extremities. Actually it is easy to see that the pressure is low, because the bag is really tight on the skis.

The cheapest pump around are small, i.e. it takes a little bit longer to get the air out from the bag, but it is not important in this case if takes 2 minutes or 10 seconds.

When I made my very first pair, I had a little problem about materials moving in the bag. At that time I machined the two cores with the right sidecut, and then I wanted to glue them on the base/edges., so I just put the different materials on the other and the two skis parallel, 1 cm apart. During the pumping, the pressure on the bag made the cores to shift one towards the other (less than 1mm), so the base/edge was shifted respect to the core. But actually it was not a problem when skiing. Just take care, and use some stops to keep the pieces in position.

Now I have a single core, wider the the two skis, and if fix the base/edge with same tape.

They are ready now. I just have to wait for some soft snow.

Cicciobombocannoniere 166-169-133, L=184cm, about 4.6Kg (per pair without bindings).

I put only biax glass (300g/m2) between the base and the wood.

169 under foot - that's a true fat ski - very impressive! And the negative camber is huge!

I like the shape with minimal reverse side cut before the binding and much behind. I've been thinking about this too for my next one with reverse sidecut. Hopefully it compensates the bad effect with catching the edge in front of the binding, turning the ski in the wrong direction (just on the piste) ....

Hopefully you manage to test them soon!

nice bump skis

for some reason i really like those bases!

Hi Davide!

I am always routing out seats for edges in my cores. You do not seem to do that! Do you not get a concave base?

Henrik

Yes, but I use a big file to thin the edges on the finished ski. They have still some concave, but it is not a big problem.

Actually I measured the base and edge thickness, and I found that the edges are always few tens of mm thicker than the edges. The best thing to do would be to use a stone grinding machine to flat the base.

OK, It's a bit late, these were already finished in Dec. but it took me until now to upload some photos...

More Photos including pics of my press setup and raw materials are up on my FLICKr account.

Dimensions: 120-80-110

Length: 195 cm

The aspen core was CNC cut but hand profiled to 2mm - 11mm - 2mm. I used Durasurf materials for base, topsheet and sidewalls, the blue 2mm thick tip/tailspacers + the rupper strips are from Snowboardmaterials.com. Both under and above the core is two layers of triax fibreglass (450g/m2). These are semi-twintips: front is 5 cm high, rear 3cm. 1cm camber. The used aviation approved epoxy has 48 total cure time and left the ski for the whole two days in the press at 4-5 bar. There is no relaxation, neither in tips nor in camber.

I mounted them up with my new and beloved Bomber Bishop - an awsesome tele binding! I especially like the ability to mount subplates to the ski and then attach the binding with four 5mm hex screws...far more convenient than G3's with inserts.

The week before chrismas I spent a few days in Tonale, Italy and rode them on mostly hardpacked artifical snow. They performed better than expected - man! they were skiable

For my taste they are a bit too soft, next time I have to go for carbon or titan. Nevertheless they were quite nice to ski in the moguls, unfortunately pow was missing :-(. But what I noticed was that they performed better when I skied them alpine style with the heels back down. When tele-ing they were a bit more bumpy (correct adjective here? - sorry, English is not my mother tongue). I'm not certain whether this is caused by the ski's softness or a design error (sweet spot to far rear as a result of the semi-twintip design? -maybe).

Great looking skis!

I really enjoyed viewing your slideshow of images on Flickr.

I would like to know a few specifics about your ski.

What are the core thickness dimensions?

What wood did you use for the core?

Did you use a CAD program to draw your ski? If so, what program and did you have any printing issues?

Congrats on a sucessful build!

cheers.

That looks super sweet! Did you mount them on chord center?

-kelvin

Thanks

Here are a few specifics:

Core thickness is 11 mm on 35 cm underfoot, and 2 mm on 20 cm in tip and 2mm on 15 cm in tail.

I used aspen for the core - laminated in 1/2" wide strips.

And yes, I used a CAD for it: AutoCAD. It's originally built for architectural work but it came out quite well. I printed it on a plotter but used the print only to align the layup in the press. Base and core were CNC cut after my local carpenter had converted the drawings with Nemetscheck VectorWorks.

No, I mounted them on balance point (That's the quasi tele mounting standard here in Europe and did always work great for me) and the Bomber Bishop gives me the ability to move the 3-pin line both one inch forward and rearward.

For the next ski I plan using carbon to achieve a better torsional rigidity as Ti/TiAl is very hard to find in proper sizes here.